Java ThreadLocal Variables – When and How to Use?

Today, one of the most critical aspects of a concurrent application is shared data. When you create thread that implements the Runnable interface and then start various Thread objects using the same Runnable object, all the threads share the same attributes that are defined inside the runnable object. This essentially means that if you change any attribute in a thread, all the threads will be affected by this change and will see the modified value by first thread. Sometimes it is desired behavior e.g. multiple threads increasing / decreasing the same counter variable; but sometimes you want to ensure that every thread MUST work on it’s own copy of thread instance and does not affect others data.

When to use ThreadLocal?

For example, consider you are working on a eCommerce application. You have a requirement to generate a unique transaction id for each and every customer request this controller process and you need to pass this transaction id to the business methods in manager/DAO classes for logging purpose. One solution could be passing this transaction id as a parameter to all the business methods. But this is not a good solution as the code is redundant and unnecessary.

To solve that, here you can use ThreadLocal variable. You can generate a transaction id in controller OR any pre-processor interceptor; and set this transaction id in the ThreadLocal. After this, whatever the methods, that this controller calls, they all can access this transaction id from the threadlocal. Also note that application controller will be servicing more that one request at a time and since each request is processed in separate thread at framework level, the transaction id will be unique to each thread and will be accessible from all over the thread’s execution path.

Read More : Share context data with JAX-RS ResteasyProviderFactory (ThreadLocalStack Example)

Inside ThreadLocal Class?

The Java Concurrency API provides a clean mechanism for thread-local variables using ThreadLocal class with a very good performance.

public class ThreadLocal<T> extends Object {...}

This class provides thread-local variables. These variables differ from their normal counterparts in that each thread that accesses one (via its get or set method) has its own, independently initialized copy of the variable. ThreadLocal instances are typically private static fields in classes that wish to associate state with a thread (e.g., a user ID or Transaction ID).

This class has following methods:

  1. get() : Returns the value in the current thread’s copy of this thread-local variable.
  2. initialValue() : Returns the current thread’s “initial value” for this thread-local variable.
  3. remove() : Removes the current thread’s value for this thread-local variable.
  4. set(T value) : Sets the current thread’s copy of this thread-local variable to the specified value.

How to use ThreadLocal?

Below example uses two thread local variables i.e. threadId and startDate. Both have been defined as “private static” fields as recommended. ‘threadId‘ will be used to identify the thread which is currently running and ‘startDate‘ will be used to get the time when thread started it’s execution. Above information will be printed in console to verify that each thread has maintained it’s own copy of variables.

class DemoTask implements Runnable
{
   // Atomic integer containing the next thread ID to be assigned
   private static final AtomicInteger        nextId   = new AtomicInteger(0);
   
   // Thread local variable containing each thread's ID
   private static final ThreadLocal<Integer> threadId = new ThreadLocal<Integer>()
                                                         {
                                                            @Override
                                                            protected Integer initialValue()
                                                            {
                                                               return nextId.getAndIncrement();
                                                            }
                                                         };

   // Returns the current thread's unique ID, assigning it if necessary
   public int getThreadId()
   {
      return threadId.get();
   }
   // Returns the current thread's starting timestamp
   private static final ThreadLocal<Date> startDate = new ThreadLocal<Date>()
                                                 {
                                                    protected Date initialValue()
                                                    {
                                                       return new Date();
                                                    }
                                                 };

  

   @Override
   public void run()
   {
      System.out.printf("Starting Thread: %s : %s\n", getThreadId(), startDate.get());
      try
      {
         TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep((int) Math.rint(Math.random() * 10));
      } catch (InterruptedException e)
      {
         e.printStackTrace();
      }
      System.out.printf("Thread Finished: %s : %s\n", getThreadId(), startDate.get());
   }
}

Now to verify that variables essentially are able to maintain their state irrespective of multiple initializations for multiple threads, let’s create three instances of this task; start the threads; and then verify the information they print in console.

Starting Thread: 0 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:40 IST 2014
Thread Finished: 0 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:40 IST 2014

Starting Thread: 1 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:42 IST 2014
Thread Finished: 1 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:42 IST 2014

Starting Thread: 2 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:44 IST 2014
Thread Finished: 2 : Wed Dec 24 15:04:44 IST 2014

In above output, sequence of printed statement will vary everytime. I have put them in sequence so that we can clearly identify that thread local values are kept safe for each thread instance; and never intermixed. Try yourself.

Most common use of thread local is when you have some object that is not thread-safe, but you want to avoid synchronizing access to that object using synchronized keyword/block. Instead, give each thread its own instance of the object to work with.
A good alternative to synchronization or threadlocal is to make the variable a local variable. Local variables are always thread safe. The only thing which may prevent you to do this is your application design constraints.
In wabapp server, it may be keep a thread pool, so a ThreadLocal var should be removed before response to the client, since current thread may be reused by next request. Also, if you do not clean up when you’re done, any references it holds to classes loaded as part of a deployed webapp will remain in the permanent heap and will never get garbage collected.

Happy Learning !!

Leave a Reply

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

About Us

HowToDoInJava provides tutorials and how-to guides on Java and related technologies.

It also shares the best practices, algorithms & solutions, and frequently asked interview questions.

Our Blogs

REST API Tutorial